still arguing with Descartes
This is a misleading analogy because of the two examples, only the triangle works both ways. If one refers to the quality of having three angles that equal 180 degrees you are necessarily talking about a triangle; that is its definition and works both ways. 180 degrees implies traingle.
However, existence does not necessarily imply God, because I have certainly determined that I exist (by the cogito), but just because I exist does not mean that I am God.
Therefore the analogy is false, and the quality of 180 degrees in a triangle is even less separable than existence in God because a triangle is the only being with three angles equaling 180 degrees but God is not the only being that exists.
(Hitchcock 421, 2.20.06)
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home